Xavier Zubiris Critique of Classical Philosophy :: Philosophy Philosophical Essays

Xavier Zubiri's Critique of Classical Philosophy ABSTRACT: The contemporary Spanish philosopher Xavier Zubiri (1893-1983) developed his philosophy in constant dialogue with the past. Zubiri believed that there are fundamental flaws with classical philosophy that require a fresh approach. His critique of classical philosophy falls into three areas: conceptual, factual, and scope. The first is treated in this paper with respect to five subjects. Zubiri believed that the structure of human intellection is incorrect in classical philosophy. This error contributes in large part to two key errors which he termed "entification of reality" and "logification of intellection." Closely related are errors concerning essence and the relationship of truth and reality. Introduction 'Classical philosophy' may be loosely defined as the set of beliefs, assumptions, and analyses of experience, together with the intellectual edifice erected upon them, worked out by Ancient Greek philosophers, especially Aristotle, and further developed by Medieval and post-Medieval thinkers, foremost among them Albertus Magnus, Thomas Aquinas, and Francisco Suarez. The tradition has continued to our own day, in the persons of Jacques Maritain and Etienne Gilson, among others. Extending over a period of 2500 years, classical philosophy has undergone many changes; but some basic underlying ideas and ways of viewing the world have remained remarkably constant. It is these which are the subject of the present study. In the course of developing his own philosophy, Xavier Zubiri (1898-1983) has thoroughly and incisively analyzed much of classical philosophy. Zubiri ultimately parts company with Aristotle and classical philosophy because he believes that despite its successes and insights, it suffers from fundamental errors with respect to both point of departure and the answers given to certain critical questions. In many cases, these errors have been set into high relief by developments in modern science; in others, they have been made visible by the critique of philosophers not in the classical tradition. Zubiri's analysis of the errors of classical philosophy may be grouped into three broad areas: Conceptual: (1) Structure of human intellection. (2) Confusion of reality and being, the "Entification of reality". (3) Subsuming of intellection under logos, the "Logification of intellection". (4) Nature and function of definition. (5) The notion of truth. Factual: (1) Inconsistency with modern science. (2) Disagreement with empirical facts. (3) Failure to reach legitimate goals. (4) Foundations and nature of mathematics. Scope: (1) The division of philosophy. (2) Ability of unaided mind to penetrate secrets of nature. (3) Structural complexity of reality. (4) Hierarchical nature of reality. (5) The canon of reality. The first category is the subject of this paper. Xavier Zubiri's Critique of Classical Philosophy :: Philosophy Philosophical Essays Xavier Zubiri's Critique of Classical Philosophy ABSTRACT: The contemporary Spanish philosopher Xavier Zubiri (1893-1983) developed his philosophy in constant dialogue with the past. Zubiri believed that there are fundamental flaws with classical philosophy that require a fresh approach. His critique of classical philosophy falls into three areas: conceptual, factual, and scope. The first is treated in this paper with respect to five subjects. Zubiri believed that the structure of human intellection is incorrect in classical philosophy. This error contributes in large part to two key errors which he termed "entification of reality" and "logification of intellection." Closely related are errors concerning essence and the relationship of truth and reality. Introduction 'Classical philosophy' may be loosely defined as the set of beliefs, assumptions, and analyses of experience, together with the intellectual edifice erected upon them, worked out by Ancient Greek philosophers, especially Aristotle, and further developed by Medieval and post-Medieval thinkers, foremost among them Albertus Magnus, Thomas Aquinas, and Francisco Suarez. The tradition has continued to our own day, in the persons of Jacques Maritain and Etienne Gilson, among others. Extending over a period of 2500 years, classical philosophy has undergone many changes; but some basic underlying ideas and ways of viewing the world have remained remarkably constant. It is these which are the subject of the present study. In the course of developing his own philosophy, Xavier Zubiri (1898-1983) has thoroughly and incisively analyzed much of classical philosophy. Zubiri ultimately parts company with Aristotle and classical philosophy because he believes that despite its successes and insights, it suffers from fundamental errors with respect to both point of departure and the answers given to certain critical questions. In many cases, these errors have been set into high relief by developments in modern science; in others, they have been made visible by the critique of philosophers not in the classical tradition. Zubiri's analysis of the errors of classical philosophy may be grouped into three broad areas: Conceptual: (1) Structure of human intellection. (2) Confusion of reality and being, the "Entification of reality". (3) Subsuming of intellection under logos, the "Logification of intellection". (4) Nature and function of definition. (5) The notion of truth. Factual: (1) Inconsistency with modern science. (2) Disagreement with empirical facts. (3) Failure to reach legitimate goals. (4) Foundations and nature of mathematics. Scope: (1) The division of philosophy. (2) Ability of unaided mind to penetrate secrets of nature. (3) Structural complexity of reality. (4) Hierarchical nature of reality. (5) The canon of reality. The first category is the subject of this paper.